![]() Your codes about the style of section gives me a very good example to learn TeXmacs further. Besides, I said âI thought TeXmacs and LaTeX should render out same equations.â means âI used to think, but now I donât.âĪnyway, besides those words defending myself, I want to say thank you for your help. Then thatâs it! I think you did more: you want to show how wrong I was to have this question even asked, which I think isnât good. But otherwise the name text is printed in math mode, so that you can use, e.g. Maybe my question 1 is controversial, I thought itâs a bug, you say no. kind of adjustment is fine tuning like line breaks and page breaks. So thereâs no need to be sensitive and allergic to those words about LaTeX. I had never ever imply that TeXmacs is a follower of TeX/LaTeX to undermine the value of this software. Unfortunately, my examples just come from LaTeX, since thereâs not many popular typesetting tools and they do have many similarities to compare. Thereâs no way to expose your intention better than giving examples. ![]() ![]() ![]() So what I ask for today is readability, method and convenience of method. #Newline in mathmod plus#I agree what you said âTypography matters about readibility and visually pleasant arrangements.â and I plus one more: convenience. I never say TeXmacs should be a pixel-by-pixel/feature-by-feature substitute of TeX/LaTeX. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |